Is government backtracking on speed limit rise?

With the House of Commons Transport Committee meeting to discuss the motorway speed limit, it appears that, while there may be a new 80mph limit, it will not apply to all motorways.

The road safety minister, Mike Penning, told the MPs that his own view was that there should not be a new limit imposed on those stretches on motorway restricted to just two lanes. He added that the government would soon be consulting on whether a rise to 80mph would be viable but included in those deliberations would be which stretches should not be subjected to a speed limit rise.

He did go on to tell the committee that motorways have changed enormously since the time when the 70mph limit was imposed and, as well as two and three lane stretches, there are other parts which have four or five lanes, so an 80mph on some parts and 70 on others may be the way forward.

He also went on to say that if an 80mph limit was introduced it would have to be strictly enforced as he did not want drivers to have it in their minds that a new limit would mean they could go at 90mph. What are your views, are you in favour of a uniform limit of 70 or 80 or for it to be varied according to the road and the conditions. Surely the risk of having a variable limit is that drivers may get confused. Let us know what your views are.

Link

Tags: , ,

Do you take risks at the wheel?

Are you one of the 25% of drivers questioned who admitted driving over the speed limit when trying to make up time if they have been stuck in a traffic jam?

A total of 2,000 British drivers were surveyed and, apart from speeding, 15% admitted to overtaking while almost 12% said they speeded up at traffic lights to try and get through before they changed. Smaller percentages owned up to undertaking, driving aggressively and taking corners at high speed.

Webuyanycar.com, which commissioned the survey, said: “We urge people to really consider the safety of themselves and others when getting behind the wheel; to leave plenty of time for their journey, and to keep calm in all situations.”

So, let’s have your confessions, are you an undertaker, an overtaker, an aggressive driver, or are you the model of careful driving whatever the situation. Let us know.

Link

 

Tags: , ,

Are “woonerfs” solution to road safety?

Could the woonerf soon be coming to the UK? If you have the faintest idea what I am talking about you are probably in a very small minority but, it is just possible that we will all be talking about them as a measure to help with road safety in the future.

The woonerf is the idea of the Dutch government, a kind of traffic calming measure, which is seen as being responsible for a 40% cut in the number of accidents in some of the neighbourhoods where it has been implemented.

Peter Rodger, the chief examiner at the Institute of Advanced Motorists, has tested the scheme in Holland and says that the position of the housing, combines with the clever use of planting, play areas and chicanes and an absence of kerbs and snakes, which leaves drivers unsure as to who has the right of way, which all combines to make the driver proceed with greater caution than perhaps would otherwise be the case. Also, the scheme is heavily weighted against the motorist in the event of an accident, which is again another reason for the drivers taking extra care.

Rodger said that the whole physical environment is designed to calm traffic spaces down, but, in the present economic climate, is there money available to radically alter the environment, while also, can the laws be changed to suit both parties? It seems a good idea in theory and is certainly a creative alternative, but could it catch on over here? What do you think?

Link

Tags: ,

Dangers of fraudulent clamping

Car clamping, even from those who are law abiding in their business, never fails to provoke rage amongst motorists, so news that five men who used a car clamping operation as, in the judge s words, a licence to print money and who were sentenced to a total of nearly eight years, will have been welcomed by many.

Worcester Crown Court heard that their firm, Midland Parking Contracts, had specifically targeted vulnerable members of society and the men all pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to defraud. Their targets had included people holding blue badges for parking and an NHS worker transporting blood samples. The court heard that the company s warning signs had not been easily visible and had often been obscured by parked cars.

The court also heard that the company s staff had been often offensive and intimidating and had caused fear as well as distress.

Have you been a victim of clamping, if so do you feel that new stricter laws should be applied to such companies, making it harder for them to strike fear into the more vulnerable? We d appreciate your comments on the whole issue of car clamping.

http://www.granthamjournal.co.uk/news/five_jailed_over_car_clamping_fraud_1_3544559

Could drink drivers have licence removed quicker?

It may be a surprise to hear that some of those charged with serious drink driving offences are not banned from driving immediately with even some involved in fatal accidents being able to keep their licence and keep driving until the case comes to trial.

There is now pressure being applied on the government to make a change and remove someone s licence immediately after the offence is committed. A campaign was launched by the family of Jamie Strong, a 16-year-old boy who was killed in a drink drive accident on New Year s Day 2010. Though the man who knocked down Jamie eventually received a four-year jail sentence, before the case came to trial he had been on bail and allowed to continue driving for eight months.

The Leeds MP Greg Mulholland says that the law should be changed so that driving licences are automatically suspended, as part of a person s bail conditions, on those cases where a driver has twice or more the legal limit of alcohol in their blood. The road safety charity Brake has also said that the government should take action and Prime Minister David Cameron has written to the Strong family, saying that he will look into the matter.

With MPs and road safety charity s pointing to the absurdity of the present law, surely it has to be changed. The thought of a man killing a child on one day being allowed to drive again the day after and for eight months or even longer before a trial, is ridiculous and the law must be changed. Let me know what your views are.

http://www.wharfedaleobserver.co.uk/news/9521424.PM_hears_of_Otley_family_s_drink_drive_law_change_campaign/

Busy month for breakdown organisations

With the winter finally emerging after months of relatively mild weather, the forecasters say the rest of February will be cold with possible snow and ice, so those on the UK s roads should take extra care.

The RAC said that the first weekend in February saw 41% more calls than normal and though the snow may have been cleared, the problem of black ice is just as great with motorists advised to drive smoothly and steadily while trying to avoid sudden braking and steering. It said it was also taking calls from people who were having trouble starting their car after such a cold weekend and advised drivers to take time to start their car up for a little while to get the engine running if the car has been inactive for any length of time.

Those having to undertake journeys at this time should always carry a shovel with them in case they have to dig themselves out of trouble, and should also carry warm clothes, boots, food and drink and a fully charged mobile phone.

So, be prepared before you venture out, especially at this time of year. Any more tips to make winter driving more bearable? Let us know.

Are you more aware of cyclists?

Recent figures suggest that more people are shunning the traffic congestion of four wheels and prefer getting about on two, and surely the fact we have more cyclists on the roads is a welcome feature of modern Britain.

It seems that the figures are especially impressive in London which has seen an increase in cyclists during the past 10 years of about 50%. However, with this trend comes its own dangers of course; the threat of more cyclists killed or injured on the nation s roads.

Although it is widely held that more cyclists on the roads generally means safer cycling, it is still a fact that there are over 30 cyclists a year killed on British roads, a higher number than found in the perhaps more bike-friendly countries on the Continent.

Is enough being done to reassure would-be cyclists that it is safe to take to the roads? The Department for Transport says that it has already committed 11m on Bikeability cycle training and that it is taking seriously the issue of cycle safety. Are they right and is enough being done to keep cyclists safe? We d love to hear from any budding cyclists among you to hear what you think.

MPs call for tougher whiplash tests

A committee of MPs has called for action to be taken on whiplash claims with tougher tests to cut down on the number of fraudulent claims.

The House of Commons transport select committee has said in a report that the current way whiplash is diagnosed can be “subjective” and this makes it ripe for exploitation by no win, no fee lawyers or “cash for crash” frauds. It also points to the increase in the number of claims for whiplash as being responsible for the resulting rise in car insurance premiums.

The committee report clarified the road accident figures and said that whiplash claims make up approximately 70% of all motor insurance personal injury claims and that insurance premiums rose by 16.4% last year. It also stated that despite there having been a 33% reduction in the number of car accident between 2000 and 2010, there has been an increase in the number of road injury claims, from 395,735 between 2000 and 2005 to 790,999 last year.

Louise Ellman, chairman of the transport select committee, said whiplash claims tend to be difficult for insurers to challenge because of the problems regarding their diagnosis and the figures demonstrate that the bar to receiving compensation in such cases needed to be raised. She warned that unless this happened and claims fell as a result, then tougher action would be needed. Mrs Ellman said that this could include legislation being introduced to require objective evidence of a whiplash injury or proof of the injury having a significant effect on the life of the victim before compensation would be paid.

The report added that insurers, solicitors and claims management companies have all contributed to this rise in motor insurance premiums and there should be a cross-departmental ministerial committee set up to look at measures that could tackle the issue of rising car insurance.

The report also identified referral fees as a significant problem and says that, though legislation is currently going through parliament to ban referral fees paid to solicitors, it doesn’t go far enough and action should be taken to ban all “sharp practices”.

The committee’s report coincides with the publication of a survey by LV=car insurance which reported that 60% of GPs found that within the last two years there had been an increase in the number of patients trying to make fraudulent claims for road injuries.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/insurance/motorinsurance/9009090/Motorists-must-prove-whiplash-to-prevent-false-claims-say-MPs.html

Tags: , , , ,